Monday, September 12, 2011

Blog Draft 2


Emanuel Voikhansky

English 1101

Dr. Dean-Ruzicka

9/8/2011

Pop Culture and Feminism Blog, draft 2

From the mega-movie star to the basement dwelling forum troll, everyone with an internet connection can not only consume obscene amounts of pop culture, but also add tidbits of their own. Blogs, forums, image boards, online games, social networks and never ending news reels are just a few of the ways that the relentless stream of mostly useless buzz and banter gets pipelined into our brains. Ask a person what blog they had read yesterday and they are not very likely to recall. Like drops of water in a wave, individual bits of pop culture are often small, indistinguishable in content or intellect from one another, and easily forgotten. But the sum of their weight and its impact upon modern life in America is unquestionable. How we speak, what we do, our perception of the world and even of our own selves are all affected by pop culture. It is a subtle thing, like a colored set of glasses we all chose to unknowing wear. Its only on the rare occasion that we look at something without these glasses that we suddenly realize how much of a difference they make.

A few days ago I was browsing yet another web based image board. A collective dumping ground for all things lol-worthy called 9gag. Maybe the funnies weren't as good that day, or maybe it was tad too early in the morning, but somewhere along my usual cycle of mindlessly scrolling through pages of funnies I started to pick up on a pattern. It seemed like more and more people were starting to post sexist quotes and pictures, and more often than not they were never intended to be funny. These kinds of things happened sometimes. It's usually just one guy with a folder full of pictures and an axe to grind, but something that day caught my attention. One picture in particular stood out to me, I've attached it above.


I will admit that I laughed for a good minute when I saw this, but after I was done laughing I began to wonder what exactly I had been laughing at.

The irony of someone who had been the butt end of many a stereotype joke laughing at a stereotype joke cannot be overlooked here. Irony aside though, here was a perfect cross section of pop-cultures assessment of women. In principle no different from the Neo-Nazi cartoons that portrayed me as a long nosed, hunch backed swindler out to earn money and backstab my friends. Countless examples of women in pop culture could have their perceived characters plotted on this graph, and all would fit nicely in one niche or another. Why is that? Who has the right to define social roles in such a way? And more importantly, what is it that causes these stereotypes to be so prevalent?

The best way to begin looking for an answer to my first question is with another question. What exactly does this "cross-section" of women's character represent? What makes it so funny? So ironic to me even? As with any good stereotype, this image takes a complicated subject and boils it down to simple cookie cutter style block of understanding meant to generalize the world around us and help us understand things that we care enough to examine, but don't care enough to know. According to the picture, there are only three important characteristics to women. They are looks, kindness, and (give the author some credit here all of you who have been spitting at the screen) intelligence. You can almost taste the bitterness of the poster. The image blatantly says that anyone interesting has flaws that make them bad people, and those without flaws don't know what good for them since they clearly ignore every good guy.

The analysis makes me ask two question. First, why is it that someone who appears to have no major flaws would not know what's good for them? A better way of stating that is who is the author to say that he is good. Just because someone shows to interest in the author does not mean that everyone they do show interest in is an asshole. Perhaps the authors bitterness makes it so but personal sentiment is never a good foundation from which to make an argument. After all, if the person truly were intelligent they would know that it is unwise to hang out with whomever they chose to label as "assholes."

The second question that my prior observation raises is perhaps as important, if not more so than the first. Why is it that if someone is intelligent and kind do they have to be ugly? What exactly does it mean to be kind or ugly? Such qualities are personally defined and socially influenced. This point alone is enough to invalidate the argument the image is attempting to make. More importantly, this point allows one to not take offense at such ideas and viewpoints.

To elaborate, we live in a country of free speech and free thought. As such, each is granted the liberty of seeing the world as they see fit, and nobody is given the power to pronounce absolute truth. In philosophical terms, absolute truth would be universal, unquestionable, a sort of law of gravity for human conduct and world view. It is my personal understanding and belief that no such law exists, and that all understanding is subjective to the person, their upbringing, and the culture that surrounds them. I could go on and on to justify this point, and will gladly share my views if asked. But since I don't want to post a 20 page blog, I will leave that argument for another time, feel free to ask me if you are curious. For now simply accept that this blog is written by me, a male, through my own subjective world view and understanding.

Continuing on the pervious train on thought, if we live in a free country and we all see the world differently than it is not my place, or your place, or anyone place, to tell another that they haven't the right to speak their mind. To demand tolerance and equality, one must be tolerant of others intolerance and inequality. Instead one can take comfort in the fact that nobody has the power to take away their own understanding of themselves and that, within obvious limits, they may act as they see fit. When faced with a contradictory view, one may argue but one cannot repress. One may keep their silence, but one should not ignore. One should learn, and hope to be learned from.*to be continued*

4 comments:

  1. What do you guys thing of my overall argument. Am I missing anything? Any points you disagree with me on? Any feedback, from general impression to philosophical loopholes would be appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Answer to the question: Thesis is somewhat unclear, and I think you can improve on the organization--it was a little hard to follow your points. Also, some phrases were too casual such as "asshole" or "But since I don't want to post a 20 page blog." I do believe in absolute truths, but I would not like to argue about it. Other than that, great use of rhetorical language and interesting diction and syntax.

    Specific pop-culture item: graph about women

    Main idea: Stereotypes are not only very offensive but also dangerous.

    Support: The author includes a lot of metaphors and critical questions. It could be more convincing if he included more specifics and examples.

    Visual elements: Great, funny visual. However, the introduction did not address the graph, and the author tended to digress from this media.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is a little difficult for me to read such long blog and understand it soon, so I reread it today. Some sentences are a bit too long and it may cause problem while reading. (For students like me, maybe.)
    Pop culture: girl paradox about a way to divide girls
    Main idea: Different ideas exists and should not be ignored.
    Support: The author provides the paradox he saw and analyses from the graph to the main idea. However, more examples can be more convincing and persuading in some way.
    Visual elements: Yes. Putting it on top of the blog can definitely attract the audiences, and, make most of them laugh and deeply impressed. However, the analysis of the graph is quite far away it might be better to put the visual element near the paragraph about it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. a quick note on how I write, I tend to write out a train out thought sort of like I did above and then "fish" for ideas and good phrases. The prior post will likely be cut in half before I publish a final draft. I know the current post is confusing and not very focused, that's what I'm going to be working on next now that I've gotten my ideas in text form.

    ReplyDelete